VOL. 26 - NO. 19
JUN 20 - 27, 2021
PO BOX 13283
OAKLAND, CA 94661-0283

510.595.7777 FAX
SUBSCRIPTION RATE:
$25/YEAR
home
home
home
home

Joint Forces Journal is published privately, and in no way is connected with DoD, the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force or Coast Guard. This website and the printed newspaper are intended for the members of the Armed Forces and their families. Contents do not necessarily reflect official views of the U.S. Government, the Department of Defense or the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force or Coast Guard, and do not imply endorsements thereof. The marital status, physical handicap, political affiliation, or any other non-merit factor of the purchases, user or patron for advertisers prohibited. If a violation or rejection of this equal opportunity policy by an advertiser is confirmed, the publisher shall refuse to print advertising from that source until the violation is corrected. Editorial content is prepared and edited privately, and is provided by the Public Affairs Office of U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force and Coast Guard installations. Correspondence and material for publication should be addressed to: Editor, Joint Forces Journal, P.O. Box 13283, Oakland, CA, 94661-0283. Deadline for receiving articles and photos is 3 p.m. Monday for publication on Friday of that week. Joint Forces Journal editorial policy is to use bylines and photo credits where applicable and when submitted.

It May Be the End of the Line for the Navy's Hypervelocity Projectile

Jun 07, 2021
by Hope Hodge Seck
The clock seems to be running out for the Navy's much-hyped electromagnetic railgun after the service closed down development on the hypervelocity round it was meant to fire in order to make room for new programs. An overview of the White House's fiscal 2022 budget request notes that the gun-launched guided projectile, previously called the hypervelocity projectile, has been canceled, for a savings of $5.9 million.

"The Department of the Navy terminated the Gun-Launched Guided Projectile Research and Development effort," the document states. "Potential reinvestment in the program will be reevaluated after an ongoing Strategic Capabilities Officer demonstration effort in Terminal Defense Analysis is complete."

The "realignment of resources" was one entry in a laundry list of Navy programs and platform cuts and divestments that included the accelerated retirement of the classic F/A-18 Hornet and a number of ships.

The meter-long projectile was first developed exclusively as a round for the Navy's experimental railgun, a $500 million effort that purported to use electricity to fire projectiles at speeds of up to Mach 6 and ranges of up to 110 nautical miles. Despite the more than 15 years that program has spent in development without being fielded, Navy officials have continued to insist they see a future for the weapon. Then-Chief of Naval Operations Adm. John Richardson said in 2018 that the service was "fully invested" in the railgun and pushing forward with development.

The hypervelocity projectile, however, seemed to gain its own momentum after officials realized it could be paired not only with the railgun, but also with existing ship deck guns to provide high-speed, low-cost firepower.

The projectile's most recent public outing came in 2018, when the guided-missile destroyer Dewey fired 20 of the rounds from an Mk 45 deck gun during the massive Rim of the Pacific exercise.

"You can get 15 rounds a minute for an air defense mission, as well as a surface-to-surface mission," Bryan Clark, then of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, said back in 2019. "That adds significant missile defense capacity when you think that each of those might be replacing a Evolved Sea Sparrow Missile or a Rolling Airframe Missile. They're a lot less expensive."

It was also noted that the gun-launched guided projectile, or GLGP, was being considered as a round for ground-based Army and Marine Corps 155mm howitzers.

But while GLGP might be less expensive than some missile systems, which can cost $1 million to $2 million per round, it was still far from cheap. A 2020 Congressional Research Service report noted that each of the rounds cost about $85,000 in 2018 dollars.

And despite the promise GLGP seemed to hold for a range of multi-service uses, the CRS report noted that fielding to ships would involve integrating the round with existing combat systems, and additional tests and war-gaming. After five years in development, these follow-on steps have yet to take place.

"Transitioning military technology efforts from the research and development phase to the procurement phase can sometimes be a challenge," the report said. "Some military technology efforts fail to make the transition, falling into what observers sometimes refer to as the 'valley of death.'"

* * * * *

Photo caption: Photograph taken from a high-speed video camera during a firing of an electromagnetic railgun at Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren, Va.. (U.S. Navy/John Williams)


subscribe

The Marine Corps Has a War Dog Graveyard on Guam

TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT: San Francisco’s American Conservatory Theater to Present Special Online Screening of “Tales of the City, The Musical”

Hawaii-Bound Kayaker Rescued by Coast Guard Off California

US Military's Elite Commando Forces Look to Expand Diversity

Army May Go Back to Job-Specific Scoring After All on the New Fitness Test

Coast Guard Gets a Pay Raise in Biden's First Budget Request

TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT: Live Streaming Set for Bay Area Playwrights Festival

Air Force Kicks Off Search for New Refueling Tanker Amid KC-46 Woes