Joint Forces Journal is published privately, and in no way is connected with DoD, the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force or Coast Guard. This website and the printed newspaper are intended for the members of the Armed Forces and their families. Contents do not necessarily reflect official views of the U.S. Government, the Department of Defense or the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force or Coast Guard, and do not imply endorsements thereof. The marital status, physical handicap, political affiliation, or any other non-merit factor of the purchases, user or patron for advertisers prohibited. If a violation or rejection of this equal opportunity policy by an advertiser is confirmed, the publisher shall refuse to print advertising from that source until the violation is corrected. Editorial content is prepared and edited privately, and is provided by the Public Affairs Office of U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force and Coast Guard installations. Correspondence and material for publication should be addressed to: Editor, Joint Forces Journal, P.O. Box 13283, Oakland, CA, 94661-0283. Deadline for receiving articles and photos is 3 p.m. Monday for publication on Friday of that week. Joint Forces Journal editorial policy is to use bylines and photo credits where applicable and when submitted.
B-1 Bomber Crews Defend Sniper Pod After Friendly Fire Incident
Jan 12, 2018
by Oriana Pawlyk
DYESS AIR FORCE BASE, Texas -- B-1B Lancer pilots and crew here know questions linger within the military community after an investigation concluded a ground team and aircrew were to blame in a 2014 friendly fire incident in which five U.S. soldiers died in Afghanistan.
A B-1 on station, responding to the team under fire from the Taliban, dropped two 500-pound bombs overtop of five U.S. soldiers and one Afghan soldier in the vicinity of Arghandab on June 9, 2014. The soldiers, including two Green Berets, died in the accident.
The investigation, headed by then-Maj. Gen. Jeffrey Harrigian, deputy director of operations for U.S. Central Command, found that the Joint Terminal Attack Controller (JTAC) and ground force commander mixed up the friendly troops' and enemy fighters' locations. Harrigian is now a lieutenant general and the Air Forces Central Command commander.
But a recent "60 Minutes" report again raised questions of whether equipment onboard the B-1 was the real culprit: the Sniper Pod, which cannot detect the infrared strobes, or "marking devices," that the troops below had turned on.
"The issue is not unique to the B-1 -- the issue is part of the targeting pod system and, frankly, just how electro optical systems work," said Lt. Col. Christopher Wachter, who noted he doesn't believe that recent news stories about the June TK incident have been accurately reported.
Wachter is director of operations for the 345th Bomb Squadron here. The incident, he said, happened a week before he became the deputy commander of the 379th Expeditionary Operations Group at Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar.
"This instance all revolved around a situation where very small, infrared flashing lights on helmets were not seen by an aircraft up at 25,000 feet," he said.
The Sniper Pod -- fitted onto aircraft such as the B-1, F-16 Fighting Falcon and F-15E Strike Eagle -- provides improved long-range target detection and identification with high-resolution imagery for non-traditional intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, according to the Air Force.
Some of its features include mid-wave forward-looking infrared (FLIR), dual-mode laser, HDTV quality video, laser spot tracker, laser marker, video data link and a digital data recorder.
Maj. Charles "Astro" Kilchrist, chief of training for the 9th Bomb Squadron, followed a truck in the New Mexico desert to show how clear and crisp the target looked from only a few miles away.
Kilchrist noted, however, that no matter how much detail the Sniper Pod gives -- a person, for example, could be seen from seven miles away, a vehicle 10 to 15 miles away -- B-1 crews always verify that coordinates match up.
"If the JTAC on the ground tells us it's a colorful house, we can't see that," said Kilchrist, also a B-1 pilot. "He's got to do better than that. But if he says it has a fence, a roof, and two cars -- while all the houses around it have one car --- in the driveway and it matches our coordinates, we can see that. And we go with that. And we verify over and over to make sure."
The offensive weapons systems officer runs the pod. The pod can pick up some things on its infrared spectrum, Lord said, adding that "it depends on the wavelength." But he wouldn't specify what could be seen, or how clearly or faintly it could be picked up by the pod's sensors.
It also helps, Lord said, if there's no thermal crossover for the pod to seek out targets.
The device sometimes "picks up the sun" in the early morning or in the early evening -- but not dusk or dawn, he said during the flight.
The B-1 community believes the 2014 incident cannot be blamed on the Sniper Pod.
"Yes, the B-1 can't do it because of the pod, but anybody else who has that pod has the same limiting factors that we do," said Lt. Col. Dominic "Beaver" Ross, director of operations for the 337th Test and Evaluations Squadron.
"It wasn't B-1 specific. If it was an A-10, or an F-15 or F-16 in that situation, they would have had the same issue. I think it was just a misconception," he said.
Training between JTACs and aircrew was improved to avoid a similar mishap in the future, officials here at the base said.
To date, there is no one aircraft system, pod or sensor that can see strobes on all types of the infrared spectrum.
"The Sniper Pod can detect IR emission, but at a higher wavelength than what is emitted by the ground force IR strobes," an Air Force JTAC said, echoing Lord's comments.
"Just not this particular IR strobe because of its emission strength," the JTAC said.
The IR strobes the troops employed during the 2014 incident were more often used for inner teaming, or for teams to identify one another at close range, he said.
"When we start talking about targeting pods that we put on aircraft, there's quite a few of them out there. Sniper is one of the more capable. But there's certain ranges in which it can see things," the JTAC said.
Night-vision goggles, for example, assist in seeing the marking devices. But during the 2014 mission, there were limitations there, as well.
"You had B-1 pilots who had night-vision goggles; however, in the orbit that they were flying, they were not close enough to visually see them ...on the ground," the JTAC said.
"The ground party and the aircraft gave each other false positives on things they couldn't see," the controller said.
In the wake of the incident, "Air Combat Command expedited upgrades to improve B-1 sensor fusion with the Sniper Pod, weapons systems and moving map, specifically the Avionics Control Unit (ACU) data feed and the Sniper Pod Operational Flight Program (OFP) upgrades," Air Force spokeswoman Ann Stefanek said.
Its manufacturer, Lockheed Martin Corp., recently said, "Lockheed Martin continuously updates the Sniper Advanced Targeting Pod (ATP) to provide additional capability to the warfighter per the U.S. Air Force requirements."
Lockheed spokeswoman Maureen Schumann said, "To date, Sniper ATP has and continues to perform as designed."
Stefanek added, "There are no upgrades related to this issue [infrared strobes] planned for the Sniper Pod at this time."
* * * * *
Photo caption: A B-1B Lancer takes off from Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar, to conduct combat operations. (U.S. Air Force photo/Senior Airman James Richardson)
© Copyright 2018 Military.com.